<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Inter5.Org Research &#187; Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inter5.org/archives/category/security/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inter5.org</link>
	<description>Information freedom for open source users.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:06:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Unhackable&#8217; Android can be hacked</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/127769</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/127769#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Platforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobilize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Hat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once thought to be unhackable, the Android phone is anything but, according to researchers presenting at Black Hat 2010.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--paging_filter-->
<p>Once thought to be <a href="http://www.productiveorganizer.com/android-productivity/android-phones-with-encrypted-bootloaderunhackable/">unhackable</a>, the <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/columnists/2010/072610-gearhead.html">Android</a> phone is anything but, according to researchers presenting at Black Hat 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/127769/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe joins Microsoft&#8217;s patch-reporting program</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/127667</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/127667#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adobe Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patch management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Patch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Program Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Companies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adobe Systems and Microsoft are now working together to give security companies a direct line into their bug-fixing efforts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--paging_filter-->
<p><a href="http://www.infoworld.com/t/adobe%20systems" >Adobe Systems</a> and <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/t/microsoft" >Microsoft</a> are now working together to give <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/d/security-central" >security</a> companies a direct line into their bug-fixing efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/127667/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open source Razorback project targets malware, zero-day exploits</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/127669</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/127669#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-source applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exploits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intrusion Prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prevention Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Targets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Razorback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerability Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sourcefire, best known for its Snort intrusion-prevention technology, Tuesday is unveiling a new open source project called Razorback that's designed to spot malware and especially zero-day exploits. "We want others to test it to see if our idea about ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--paging_filter-->
<p>Sourcefire, best known for its Snort intrusion-prevention technology, Tuesday is unveiling a new <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/subnets/opensource/" >open source</a> project called Razorback that&#8217;s designed to spot malware and especially zero-day exploits.</p>
<p>&#8220;We want others to test it to see if our idea about this new protection framework is as innovative as we think it is,&#8221; says Matt Watchinski, senior director on the Sourcefire vulnerability research team.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7317961027772759";
/* 234x60, created 3/22/09 */
google_ad_slot = "5818753955";
google_ad_width = 234;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/127669/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cyber crime costs businesses each $3.8 million per year</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/127489</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/127489#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cyber Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Industry Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insiders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malicious Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web attacks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study of 45 U.S. organizations found that cyber crime -- including Web attacks, malicious code, and rogue insiders -- costs each one of them $3.8 million per year, on average, and results in about one successful attack each week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--paging_filter-->
<p>A new study of 45 U.S. organizations found that <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/t/cyber%20crime" >cyber crime</a> &#8212; including Web attacks, <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/t/malware" >malicious code</a>, and rogue insiders &#8212; costs each one of them $3.8 million per year, on average, and results in about one successful attack each week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/127489/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security vs. Convenience</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/127351</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/127351#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Powers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
    
            
                            
        

Although my intent is not to start the next GNOME/KDE-level war, it seems there must be a happy medium between total desktop insecurity and total desktop unusability. Linux offers so many ways t...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float: left;margin: 4px;"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7317961027772759";
/* 234x60, created 3/22/09 */
google_ad_slot = "5818753955";
google_ad_width = 234;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p><div class="field field-type-filefield field-field-node-image">
<div class="field-items">
<div class="field-item odd">
                    <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/content/security-vs-convenience" class="imagecache imagecache-node-page imagecache-linked imagecache-node-page_linked"><img src="http://www.linuxjournal.com/files/linuxjournal.com/ufiles/imagecache/node-page/nodeimage/story/security.png" alt="Security" title=""  class="imagecache imagecache-node-page" width="200" height="283" /></a>        </div>
</p></div>
</div>
<p><!--paging_filter-->
<p>Although my intent is not to start the next GNOME/KDE-level war, it seems there must be a happy medium between total desktop insecurity and total desktop unusability. Linux offers so many ways to secure data that it&#8217;s important to realize it&#8217;s okay for folks to have different needs and desires. Sure, there are some basic security measures we all should take—things like:<span class="read-more"><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/content/security-vs-convenience"> more>></a></span></p>
<ul>
<li>
</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/hdbRqDJyWUvN-HhyFTt4u4QqS98/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/hdbRqDJyWUvN-HhyFTt4u4QqS98/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/hdbRqDJyWUvN-HhyFTt4u4QqS98/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/hdbRqDJyWUvN-HhyFTt4u4QqS98/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?a=m01WHE3zNiE:5U1apa0RwBQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?a=m01WHE3zNiE:5U1apa0RwBQ:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?i=m01WHE3zNiE:5U1apa0RwBQ:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?a=m01WHE3zNiE:5U1apa0RwBQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?i=m01WHE3zNiE:5U1apa0RwBQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?a=m01WHE3zNiE:5U1apa0RwBQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?i=m01WHE3zNiE:5U1apa0RwBQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?a=m01WHE3zNiE:5U1apa0RwBQ:dnMXMwOfBR0"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?a=m01WHE3zNiE:5U1apa0RwBQ:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?a=m01WHE3zNiE:5U1apa0RwBQ:l6gmwiTKsz0"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?a=m01WHE3zNiE:5U1apa0RwBQ:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"/></a>
</div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/linuxjournalcom/~4/m01WHE3zNiE" height="1" width="1"/></p>
<p></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/127351/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Open Source SNORT Dead?</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/127315</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/127315#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 12:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CmdrTaco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[alphadogg writes "Is Snort, the 12-year-old open-source intrusion detection and prevention system, dead?

The Open Information Security Foundation (OISF), a nonprofit group funded by the U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS) to come up with next-genera...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alphadogg writes &#8220;Is Snort, the 12-year-old open-source intrusion detection and prevention system, dead?</p>
<p>The Open Information Security Foundation (OISF), a nonprofit group funded by the U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS) to come up with next-generation open source IDS/IPS, thinks so. But Snort&#8217;s creator, Martin Roesch, begs to differ, and in fact, calls the OISF&#8217;s first open source IDS/IPS code, Suricata 1.0 released this week, a cheap knock-off of Snort paid for with taxpayer dollars.</p>
<p>The OISF was founded about a year and a half ago with $1 million in funding from a DHS cybersecurity research program, according to Matt Jonkman, president of OISF. He says OISF was founded to form an open source alternative and replacement to Snort, which he says is now considered dead since the research on what is supposed to be the next-generation version of Snort, Snort 3.0, has stalled.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://it.slashdot.org/story/10/07/21/1221209/Is-Open-Source-SNORT-Dead"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Is+Open+Source+SNORT+Dead?:+http://bit.ly/b21zBR"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/story/10/07/21/1221209/Is-Open-Source-SNORT-Dead?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1727006&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/JXKuMLevA1yfU30NgMqqwIbM4zY/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/JXKuMLevA1yfU30NgMqqwIbM4zY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/JXKuMLevA1yfU30NgMqqwIbM4zY/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/JXKuMLevA1yfU30NgMqqwIbM4zY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/tXMStm9QhP4" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/127315/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Damn Vulnerable Linux &#8212; Most Vulnerable Linux Ever</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/127208</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/127208#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 23:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>timothy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An anonymous reader writes "Usually, when installing a new operating system the hope is that it's as up-to-date as possible. After installation there's bound to be a few updates required, but no more than a few megabytes. Damn Vulnerable Linux is diffe...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float: left;margin: 4px;"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7317961027772759";
/* 234x60, created 3/22/09 */
google_ad_slot = "5818753955";
google_ad_width = 234;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p><p>An anonymous reader writes &#8220;Usually, when installing a new operating system the hope is that it&#8217;s as up-to-date as possible. After installation there&#8217;s bound to be a few updates required, but no more than a few megabytes. Damn Vulnerable Linux is different; it&#8217;s shipped in as vulnerable a state as possible. As the DVL website explains: &#8216;Damn Vulnerable Linux (DVL) is everything a good Linux distribution isn&#8217;t. Its developers have spent hours stuffing it with broken, ill-configured, outdated, and exploitable software that makes it vulnerable to attacks. DVL isn&#8217;t built to run on your desktop &ndash; it&#8217;s a learning tool for security students.&#8217;&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/07/17/2136237/Damn-Vulnerable-Linux-mdash-Most-Vulnerable-Linux-Ever"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Damn+Vulnerable+Linux+&mdash;+Most+Vulnerable+Linux+Ever:+http://bit.ly/9VeThd"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/07/17/2136237/Damn-Vulnerable-Linux-mdash-Most-Vulnerable-Linux-Ever?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1723106&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Nw1puHTpVMYhBLwIrcmSTA0f9HA/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Nw1puHTpVMYhBLwIrcmSTA0f9HA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Nw1puHTpVMYhBLwIrcmSTA0f9HA/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Nw1puHTpVMYhBLwIrcmSTA0f9HA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/5rK2C-PN8wQ" height="1" width="1"/></p>
<p></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/127208/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OAuth, OpenID Password Crack Could Affect Millions</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/127177</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/127177#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 19:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Soulskill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basic Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dozens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Password Crack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Passwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Flaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taylor Nelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xbox 360]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CWmike writes "Researchers Nate Lawson and Taylor Nelson say they've discovered a basic security flaw that affects dozens of open-source software libraries &#8212; including those used by software that implements the OAuth and OpenID standards &#8212; ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CWmike writes &#8220;Researchers Nate Lawson and Taylor Nelson say they&#8217;ve discovered a basic security flaw that affects dozens of open-source software libraries &mdash; including those used by software that implements the OAuth and OpenID standards &mdash; that are used to check passwords and user names when people log into websites such as Twitter and Digg. By trying to log in again and again, cycling through characters and measuring the time it takes for the computer to respond, hackers can ultimately figure out the correct passwords. This may all sound very theoretical, but timing attacks can actually succeed in the real world. Three years ago, one was used to hack Microsoft&#8217;s Xbox 360 gaming system, and people who build smart cards have added timing attack protection for years. The researchers plan to discuss their attacks at the Black Hat conference later this month in Las Vegas.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://news.slashdot.org/story/10/07/16/1753232/OAuth-OpenID-Password-Crack-Could-Affect-Millions"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=OAuth,+OpenID+Password+Crack+Could+Affect+Millions:+http://bit.ly/ce4E3B"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://news.slashdot.org/story/10/07/16/1753232/OAuth-OpenID-Password-Crack-Could-Affect-Millions?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1722212&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/mO1TiN70yb4Z-3C0nl5IBjGayBA/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/mO1TiN70yb4Z-3C0nl5IBjGayBA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/mO1TiN70yb4Z-3C0nl5IBjGayBA/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/mO1TiN70yb4Z-3C0nl5IBjGayBA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/ZjQX_0UbVlg" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/127177/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malware Targets Shortcut Flaw In Windows, SCADA</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/126747</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/126747#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>timothy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti Virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belarus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent Researcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lnk Files]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malicious software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nimh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scada Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiconductor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shortcut Files]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Targets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usb Drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virus Researchers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tsu doh nimh writes "Anti-virus researchers have discovered a new strain of malicious software that spreads via USB drives and takes advantage of a previously unknown vulnerability in the way Microsoft Windows handles '.lnk' or shortcut files. Belarus-...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tsu doh nimh writes &#8220;Anti-virus researchers have discovered a new strain of malicious software that spreads via USB drives and takes advantage of a previously unknown vulnerability in the way Microsoft Windows handles &#8216;.lnk&#8217; or shortcut files. Belarus-based VirusBlokAda discovered malware that includes rootkit functionality to hide the malware, and the rootkit drivers appear to be digitally signed by Realtek Semiconductor, a legitimate hi-tech company. In a further wrinkle, independent researcher Frank Boldewin found that the complexity and stealth of this malware may be due to the fact that it is targeting SCADA systems, or those designed for controlling large, complex and distributed control networks, such as those used at power and manufacturing plants. Meanwhile, Microsoft says it&#8217;s investigating claims that this malware exploits a new vulnerability in Windows.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://it.slashdot.org/story/10/07/15/1955228/Malware-Targets-Shortcut-Flaw-In-Windows-SCADA"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Malware+Targets+Shortcut+Flaw+In+Windows,+SCADA:+http://bit.ly/aYFCR6"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/story/10/07/15/1955228/Malware-Targets-Shortcut-Flaw-In-Windows-SCADA?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1721020&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/t6fmQtDkzU6wI_ft8Yo9AkeYfwk/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/t6fmQtDkzU6wI_ft8Yo9AkeYfwk/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/t6fmQtDkzU6wI_ft8Yo9AkeYfwk/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/t6fmQtDkzU6wI_ft8Yo9AkeYfwk/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/UBo1L1_H57Y" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/126747/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft: Apple takes the vulnerability crown</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/126712</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/126712#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>InfoWorld Tech Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Application Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attendees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Turner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partner Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worldwide Partner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speaking at the Microsoft Worldwide Partner Conference (WPC), COO Kevin Turner told attendees that Microsoft's archrival Apple is now No. 1 in software vulnerabilities, with database rival Oracle in the No. 2 spot.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--paging_filter-->
<div style="padding: 8px; background: none no-repeat scroll center top #ffffff; position: relative; float: right; width: 243px; height: 182px;"><img src="http://www.infoworld.com/sites/infoworld.com/files/media/image/Apple_vs_MS_hp.jpg" alt="Microsoft: Apple takes the vulnerability crown" width="243" height="182" align="right" /></div>
<p>Speaking at the Microsoft Worldwide Partner Conference (WPC), COO Kevin Turner told attendees that Microsoft&#8217;s archrival Apple is now No. 1 in software vulnerabilities, with database rival Oracle in the No. 2 spot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/126712/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finally &#8212; a hacking conference just for kids!</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/126346</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/126346#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 19:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>InfoWorld Tech Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Enthusiasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Term Hacker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technology enthusiasts and the ranks of the curious have been trying for years to rescue the term "hacker" from its pejorative meaning. A new conference that will teach kids the wonders of hacking may be one sign that such efforts are paying off.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--paging_filter-->
<div style="padding: 8px; background: none no-repeat scroll center top #ffffff; position: relative; float: right; width: 243px; height: 182px;"><img src="http://www.infoworld.com/sites/infoworld.com/files/media/image/my_child_code_hp.jpg" alt="Finally -- a hacking conference just for kids!" width="243" height="182" align="right" /></div>
<p>Technology enthusiasts and the ranks of the curious have been trying for years to rescue the term &#8220;hacker&#8221; from its pejorative meaning. A new conference that will teach kids the wonders of hacking may be one sign that such efforts are paying off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/126346/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to keep Windows XP SP2 safer after Microsoft stops patching</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/126275</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/126275#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Pack 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Xp Service Pack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Xp Service Pack 2 Sp2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xp Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe you didn't get the memo: Tomorrow marks the end of patches for Windows XP Service Pack 2 (SP2). And you're still running the nearly-six-year-old edition.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--paging_filter-->
<p>Maybe you didn&#8217;t get the memo: Tomorrow marks the end of patches for <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/t/windows%20xp" >Windows XP</a> Service Pack 2 (SP2).</p>
<p>And you&#8217;re still running the nearly-six-year-old edition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/126275/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Plans Cyber Shield For Private Companies and Utilities</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/125894</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/125894#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samzenpus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expansive Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Running]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sensors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spyware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wiggles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wiggles writes "The federal government is launching an expansive program dubbed 'Perfect Citizen' to detect cyber assaults on private companies and government agencies running such critical infrastructure as the electricity grid and nuclear-power plant...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wiggles writes &#8220;The federal government is launching an expansive program dubbed &#8216;Perfect Citizen&#8217; to detect cyber assaults on private companies and government agencies running such critical infrastructure as the electricity grid and nuclear-power plants, according to people familiar with the program.The surveillance by the National Security Agency, the government&#8217;s chief eavesdropping agency, would rely on a set of sensors deployed in computer networks for critical infrastructure that would be triggered by unusual activity suggesting an impending cyber attack, though it wouldn&#8217;t persistently monitor the whole system, these people said. How do we feel about NSA spyware in all of our infrastructure?&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://it.slashdot.org/story/10/07/08/1449254/US-Plans-Cyber-Shield-For-Private-Companies-and-Utilities"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=US+Plans+Cyber+Shield+For+Private+Companies+and+Utilities:+http://bit.ly/dqsEUm"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/story/10/07/08/1449254/US-Plans-Cyber-Shield-For-Private-Companies-and-Utilities?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1712656&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/9MWEii6dY0lmUu01Swqx-mU7jEM/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/9MWEii6dY0lmUu01Swqx-mU7jEM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/9MWEii6dY0lmUu01Swqx-mU7jEM/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/9MWEii6dY0lmUu01Swqx-mU7jEM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/BxVWhonW1oA" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/125894/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security researchers wage war on Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/125729</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/125729#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>InfoWorld Tech Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerability assessment/management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[researcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Researchers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wage War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A newly formed gang of rogue security researchers calling itself MSRC (Microsoft-Spurned Researcher Collective) has announced it will publicize any Windows vulnerabilities it finds, rather than reporting them privately to Microsoft for the company to p...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--paging_filter-->
<div style="padding: 8px; background: none no-repeat scroll center top #ffffff; position: relative; float: right; width: 243px; height: 182px;"><img src="http://www.infoworld.com/sites/infoworld.com/files/media/image/computer_soldiers_hp.jpg" alt="Security researchers wage war on Microsoft" width="243" height="182" align="right" /></div>
<p>A newly formed gang of rogue security researchers calling itself MSRC (Microsoft-Spurned Researcher Collective) has announced it will publicize any Windows vulnerabilities it finds, rather than reporting them privately to Microsoft for the company to patch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/125729/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photo Kiosks Infecting Customers&#8217; USB Devices</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/125639</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/125639#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kdawson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fuji Photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liability Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mdash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo Kiosks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidiary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trojan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usb Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usb Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woolworths]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Risky Biz blog brings news that Big W, a subsidiary of Woolworths, has Windows-based Fuji photo kiosks in at least some of its stores that don't run antivirus software, and are therefore spreading infections, such as Trojan-Poison-36, via customers...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Risky Biz blog brings news that Big W, a subsidiary of Woolworths, has Windows-based Fuji photo kiosks in at least some of its stores that don&#8217;t run antivirus software, and are therefore spreading infections, such as Trojan-Poison-36, via customers&#8217; USB storage devices. Here is the account of the original reporter. &#8220;It&#8217;s not just the lack of AV that&#8217;s the problem&#8230; it appears there&#8217;s been zero thought put into the problem of malware spreading via these kiosks. Why not just treat customers&#8217; USB devices as read-only? Why allow the kiosks to write to them at all? It would be interesting to find out which company &mdash; Fuji, Big W, or even some other third party &mdash; is responsible for the maintenance of the machines. It would also be interesting to find out if there are any liability issues here for Big W in light of its boneheaded lack of security planning.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://it.slashdot.org/story/10/07/06/0019234/Photo-Kiosks-Infecting-Customers-USB-Devices"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Photo+Kiosks+Infecting+Customers'+USB+Devices:+http://bit.ly/9Hk1jR"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/story/10/07/06/0019234/Photo-Kiosks-Infecting-Customers-USB-Devices?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1708978&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/5GHSsM8Abx5MrJ9faJ4CCm6zsnQ/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/5GHSsM8Abx5MrJ9faJ4CCm6zsnQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/5GHSsM8Abx5MrJ9faJ4CCm6zsnQ/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/5GHSsM8Abx5MrJ9faJ4CCm6zsnQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/tlldbqw0fjI" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/125639/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HSBC Bank Sends Activated Debit Cards Through Mail</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/125610</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/125610#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kdawson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Checking Account]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debit Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraudulent Transactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hsbc Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vague Statements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Knowzy writes "At least two divisions at HSBC Bank apparently failed card issuing 101 and are mailing out debit cards pre-activated. Because they are debit cards, fraudulent transactions come directly out of a victim's checking account. A similar repor...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knowzy writes &#8220;At least two divisions at HSBC Bank apparently failed card issuing 101 and are mailing out debit cards pre-activated. Because they are debit cards, fraudulent transactions come directly out of a victim&#8217;s checking account. A similar report from 2004 suggests this issue is longstanding and widespread. When confronted with the evidence, HSBC would not commit to fixing this issue, preferring instead to offer vague statements like, &#8216;Through our systems and analytics, we focus on the greatest and most active threats in an effort to avoid negatively impacting customer experience.&#8217;&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://news.slashdot.org/story/10/07/05/2235205/HSBC-Bank-Sends-Activated-Debit-Cards-Through-Mail"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=HSBC+Bank+Sends+Activated+Debit+Cards+Through+Mail:+http://bit.ly/cKB6Jg"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://news.slashdot.org/story/10/07/05/2235205/HSBC-Bank-Sends-Activated-Debit-Cards-Through-Mail?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1708914&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/f_g_EWktZKdVy26UWOMEiINl0mw/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/f_g_EWktZKdVy26UWOMEiINl0mw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/f_g_EWktZKdVy26UWOMEiINl0mw/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/f_g_EWktZKdVy26UWOMEiINl0mw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/h4EcDoAwiiQ" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/125610/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ATM Vendors Threaten, Stop Research Presentation</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/125565</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/125565#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Soulskill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymous Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atm Vendors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancellation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Criminals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exploits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack In The Box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hat Hacker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Minute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presentation Covers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raoul Chiesa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Presentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Underground Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An anonymous reader writes "A presentation about 'The Underground Economy', by Italian white hat hacker and security expert Raoul Chiesa, was replaced at the last minute during last week's Hack In The Box conference. The reason behind this cancellation...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An anonymous reader writes &#8220;A presentation about &#8216;The Underground Economy&#8217;, by Italian white hat hacker and security expert Raoul Chiesa, was replaced at the last minute during last week&#8217;s Hack In The Box conference. The reason behind this cancellation was that Chiesa received legal pressure from ATM vendors over the fact that the originally scheduled presentation covers details of various techniques and exploits of vulnerabilities that cyber criminals use to break into ATMs &mdash; flaws that have been known for a long time.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://news.slashdot.org/story/10/07/05/1740205/ATM-Vendors-Threaten-Stop-Research-Presentation"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=ATM+Vendors+Threaten,+Stop+Research+Presentation:+http://bit.ly/9Oe1tj"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://news.slashdot.org/story/10/07/05/1740205/ATM-Vendors-Threaten-Stop-Research-Presentation?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1708736&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/m4pLq0F62sdEfKdPMOsl57LM8rE/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/m4pLq0F62sdEfKdPMOsl57LM8rE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/m4pLq0F62sdEfKdPMOsl57LM8rE/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/m4pLq0F62sdEfKdPMOsl57LM8rE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/AE-ZNxLJwvM" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/125565/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Behind Cyberwar FUD</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/125440</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/125440#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 13:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Soulskill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nicola Hahn writes "The inevitable occurred this week as The Economist broached the topic of cyberwar with a couple of articles in its July 3rd issue. The first article concludes that 'countries should agree on more modest accords, or even just informa...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicola Hahn writes &#8220;The inevitable occurred this week as The Economist broached the topic of cyberwar with a couple of articles in its July 3rd issue. The first article concludes that &#8216;countries should agree on more modest accords, or even just informal &#8220;rules of the road&#8221; that would raise the political cost of cyber-attacks.&#8217; It also makes vague references to &#8216;greater co-operation between governments and the private sector.&#8217; When attribution is a lost cause (and it is), international treaties are meaningless because there&#8217;s no way to determine if a participant has broken them. The second recommendation is even more alarming because it&#8217;s using a loaded phrase that, in the past couple of years, has been wielded by those who advocate Orwellian solutions. The other article is a morass of conflicting messages. It presumes to focus on cyberwar, yet the bulk of the material deals with cybercrime and run-of-the-mill espionage. Then there&#8217;s also the standard ploy of hypothetical scenarios: depicting how we might be attacked and what the potential outcome of these attacks could be. The author concludes with the ominous warning that terrorists &#8216;prefer the gory theatre of suicide-bombings to the anonymity of computer sabotage &mdash; for now.&#8217; What&#8217;s truly disturbing is that The Economist never goes beyond a superficial analysis of the topic to examine what&#8217;s driving all of the fear, uncertainty, and doubt (PDF), a subject dealt with in this Lockdown 2010 white paper.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://news.slashdot.org/story/10/07/04/1247241/Behind-Cyberwar-FUD"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Behind+Cyberwar+FUD:+http://bit.ly/csSlpg"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://news.slashdot.org/story/10/07/04/1247241/Behind-Cyberwar-FUD?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1707782&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/s6n7IlGauOeUG7sIEfjNvYBfVSY/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/s6n7IlGauOeUG7sIEfjNvYBfVSY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/s6n7IlGauOeUG7sIEfjNvYBfVSY/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/s6n7IlGauOeUG7sIEfjNvYBfVSY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/UnrKFPOh5yI" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/125440/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Many Popular Windows Apps Ignore Security Options</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/125350</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/125350#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 17:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Soulskill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Quicktime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Krebs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foxit Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Good Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest Versions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mdash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Picasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realplayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secunia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Specialist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Versions Of Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winamp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[eldavojohn writes "The latest versions of Microsoft Windows have some good security options available &#8212; now if only they could get their most popular third-party applications to use them. A report from Secunia takes a look at two such options &#38;md...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eldavojohn writes &#8220;The latest versions of Microsoft Windows have some good security options available &mdash; now if only they could get their most popular third-party applications to use them. A report from Secunia takes a look at two such options &mdash; DEP and ASLR &mdash; and Brian Krebs breaks down who is using them and who is not. A security specialist noted, &#8216;If both DEP and ASLR are correctly deployed, the ease of exploit development decreases significantly. While most Microsoft applications take full advantage of DEP and ASLR, third-party applications have yet to fully adapt to the requirements of the two mechanisms (PDF). If we also consider the increasing number of vulnerabilities discovered in third-party applications, an attacker&#8217;s choice for targeting a popular third-party application rather than a Microsoft product becomes very understandable.&#8217; Among those with neither DEP or ASLR: Apple Quicktime, Foxit Reader, Google Picasa, Java, OpenOffice.org, RealPlayer, and AOL&#8217;s Winamp. While Flash player can&#8217;t implement DEP, it does have ASLR. Google Chrome is the only popular third-party application listed with stars across the board.&#8221;<br />
It&#8217;s worth noting that several apps highlighted in the Secunia research paper have added support for those security options in recent patches, or are in the process of doing so. Examples include Firefox, VLC, and Foxit Reader.
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://developers.slashdot.org/story/10/07/03/1651208/Many-Popular-Windows-Apps-Ignore-Security-Options"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Many+Popular+Windows+Apps+Ignore+Security+Options:+http://bit.ly/aWc5qG"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/story/10/07/03/1651208/Many-Popular-Windows-Apps-Ignore-Security-Options?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1707424&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/HwvOoUO2yKR0dTWYr6NpvMdlYFc/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/HwvOoUO2yKR0dTWYr6NpvMdlYFc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/HwvOoUO2yKR0dTWYr6NpvMdlYFc/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/HwvOoUO2yKR0dTWYr6NpvMdlYFc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/3SHj3C1gEKo" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/125350/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quiz: How well do you know IT security?</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/125225</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/125225#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Babb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Array]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firewalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quiz Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
      Dek:&#160;
    
            
                    Firewalls, VPNs, SSL, PKI, encryption -- this quiz will test your knowledge of a wide array of IT security issues        
        


      Source:&#160;
    
            
                    Netwo...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--paging_filter-->
<div class="field field-type-text field-field-slideshow-dek">
<div class="field-label">Dek:&nbsp;</div>
<div class="field-items">
<div class="field-item odd">
                    Firewalls, VPNs, SSL, PKI, encryption &#8212; this quiz will test your knowledge of a wide array of IT security issues        </div>
</p></div>
</div>
<div class="field field-type-nodereference field-field-slideshow-source">
<div class="field-label">Source:&nbsp;</div>
<div class="field-items">
<div class="field-item odd">
                    <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/%5Bprimary-term-alias-prefix%5D/%5Bprimary-term%5D/network-world-044">Network World</a>        </div>
</p></div>
</div>
<div class="field field-type-number-integer field-field-essentials">
<div class="field-items">
<div class="field-item odd">
                    No        </div>
</p></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/125225/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
