<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Inter5.Org Research &#187; Government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inter5.org/archives/category/government/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inter5.org</link>
	<description>Information freedom for open source users.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:06:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tennessee Town Releases Red Light Camera Stats</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/127685</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/127685#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>timothy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SonicSpike links to what he calls "a transparent look at some statistics released by a small town's red-light camera program," writing

"Specifically, in the last fiscal quarter, 7,213 incidents were recorded, 2,673 incidents were rejected by the revie...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SonicSpike links to what he calls &#8220;a transparent look at some statistics released by a small town&#8217;s red-light camera program,&#8221; writing</p>
<p>&#8220;Specifically, in the last fiscal quarter, 7,213 incidents were recorded, 2,673 incidents were rejected by the reviewing officer, and 662 incidents were not processed due to technical issues or lack of information. All in all 3,878 citations were issued between April I &mdash; June 30 in a town of 17,000 residents. Interestingly enough there are two nearby cities claiming that individuals &#8216;have no presumption of innocence&#8217; when accused by the red light cameras.&#8221; Fines for no-harm-no-foul rolling stops bug me, and remind me of Gary Lauder&#8217;s suggestion to merge stop signs and yield signs.
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/07/28/1947231/Tennessee-Town-Releases-Red-Light-Camera-Stats"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Tennessee+Town+Releases+Red+Light+Camera+Stats:+http://bit.ly/9Puhew"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/07/28/1947231/Tennessee-Town-Releases-Red-Light-Camera-Stats?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1735716&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/fodLOXSLoxlcnaSye-u0eUXfBi0/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/fodLOXSLoxlcnaSye-u0eUXfBi0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/fodLOXSLoxlcnaSye-u0eUXfBi0/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/fodLOXSLoxlcnaSye-u0eUXfBi0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/nEGRq4r6a2M" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/127685/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK Delays National Broadband For Three Years</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/127221</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/127221#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Soulskill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DMandPenfold writes "The British government has said that it will not be able to complete the rollout of broadband across the UK until 2015, blaming a lack of funds. 'Under the previous Labour government's original plans, everyone in the UK would have ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DMandPenfold writes &#8220;The British government has said that it will not be able to complete the rollout of broadband across the UK until 2015, blaming a lack of funds. &#8216;Under the previous Labour government&#8217;s original plans, everyone in the UK would have had access to 2 megabits per second broadband by 2012.&#8217; On Thursday, UK Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt organized a meeting for major broadband providers &#8216;to identify the current barriers to providing basic level broadband in rural areas as well as suggesting ways to make more use of publicly-owned networks, such as those connecting schools and hospitals.&#8217; BT, the country&#8217;s biggest telco, estimates that the necessary government funding for the project will be as much as &pound;2 billion.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://news.slashdot.org/story/10/07/18/1417238/UK-Delays-National-Broadband-For-Three-Years"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=UK+Delays+National+Broadband+For+Three+Years:+http://bit.ly/9WcMnz"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://news.slashdot.org/story/10/07/18/1417238/UK-Delays-National-Broadband-For-Three-Years?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1723428&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/PVP9n8P7GUrbJb8Gts4RwuobOeI/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/PVP9n8P7GUrbJb8Gts4RwuobOeI/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/PVP9n8P7GUrbJb8Gts4RwuobOeI/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/PVP9n8P7GUrbJb8Gts4RwuobOeI/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/YAxClpfmZRE" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/127221/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Gov&#8217;t Orders 73,000 Private Websites Offline</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/127178</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/127178#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 18:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Soulskill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[joeszilagyi sends this excerpt from TorrentFreak:
"... according to the owner of a free WordPress platform which hosts more than 73,000 blogs, his network of sites has been completely shut down on the orders of the authorities. Blogetery.com has been w...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>joeszilagyi sends this excerpt from TorrentFreak:<br />
&#8220;&#8230; according to the owner of a free WordPress platform which hosts more than 73,000 blogs, his network of sites has been completely shut down on the orders of the authorities. Blogetery.com has been with host BurstNet for 7 months, but on Friday July 9th the site disappeared. &#8230; Due to the fact that the authorities aren&#8217;t sharing information and BurstNet are sworn to secrecy, it is proving almost impossible to confirm the exact reason why Blogetery has been completely taken down. The owner does, however, admit to handling many copyright-related cease and desists in the past, albeit in a timely manner as the DMCA requires.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/07/16/171201/US-Govt-Orders-73000-Private-Websites-Offline"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=US+Gov't+Orders+73,000+Private+Websites+Offline:+http://bit.ly/9Oxl23"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/07/16/171201/US-Govt-Orders-73000-Private-Websites-Offline?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1722158&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/RHsUxCgjk5ZQPQ_iMdnHrcdURHU/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/RHsUxCgjk5ZQPQ_iMdnHrcdURHU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/RHsUxCgjk5ZQPQ_iMdnHrcdURHU/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/RHsUxCgjk5ZQPQ_iMdnHrcdURHU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/_9MrzACwiOI" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/127178/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talk On Chinese Cyber Army Pulled From Black Hat</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/126795</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/126795#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samzenpus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Application Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Las Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offensive Capabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Efforts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taiwan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taiwanese Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne Huang]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trailrunner7 writes "A talk on China's state-sponsored offensive security efforts scheduled for the Black Hat conference in Las Vegas later this month has been pulled after concerns were raised by people within the Chinese and Taiwanese government abou...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trailrunner7 writes &#8220;A talk on China&#8217;s state-sponsored offensive security efforts scheduled for the Black Hat conference in Las Vegas later this month has been pulled after concerns were raised by people within the Chinese and Taiwanese government about the talk&#8217;s content. The presentation was to be delivered by Wayne Huang, CTO of Armorize, an application security company with R&amp;D operations in Taiwan. The talk was billed as an in-depth, historical look at the offensive capabilities and operations of China&#8217;s so-called cyber-army.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/07/15/1530225/Talk-On-Chinese-Cyber-Army-Pulled-From-Black-Hat"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Talk+On+Chinese+Cyber+Army+Pulled+From+Black+Hat:+http://bit.ly/dde2UL"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/07/15/1530225/Talk-On-Chinese-Cyber-Army-Pulled-From-Black-Hat?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1720680&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/4q8AcBwxxWJk2p2NqSorLGj9y8A/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/4q8AcBwxxWJk2p2NqSorLGj9y8A/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/4q8AcBwxxWJk2p2NqSorLGj9y8A/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/4q8AcBwxxWJk2p2NqSorLGj9y8A/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/evCsDGZc-Hw" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/126795/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Black Hat talk on China&#8217;s &#8216;cyber army&#8217; pulled after pressure</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/126576</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/126576#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Black Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Central]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A talk on China's military cyber-attack capabilities has been pulled from the Black Hat security conference schedule following pressure from Taiwanese and Chinese agencies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--paging_filter-->
<p>A talk on China&#8217;s military <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/t/cyber%20crime" >cyber-attack</a> capabilities has been pulled from the <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/t/black%20hat" >Black Hat security conference</a> schedule following pressure from Taiwanese and Chinese agencies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/126576/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OSS: Europe vs. The United States</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/126402</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/126402#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Roberts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Purchasing Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux Journal Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neelie Kroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proponent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proprietary Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
    
            
                            
        

Neelie Kroes is IT Chief for Europe and a staunch proponent of Open Source Software.  A previous Linux Journal ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="field field-type-filefield field-field-node-image">
<div class="field-items">
<div class="field-item odd">
                    <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/content/oss-europe-vs-united-states" class="imagecache imagecache-node-page imagecache-linked imagecache-node-page_linked"><img src="http://www.linuxjournal.com/files/linuxjournal.com/ufiles/imagecache/node-page/nodeimage/story/anti-government-corruption.jpg" alt="" title=""  class="imagecache imagecache-node-page" width="200" height="144" /></a>        </div>
</p></div>
</div>
<p><!--paging_filter-->
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neelie_Kroes">Neelie Kroes</a> is IT Chief for Europe and a staunch proponent of Open Source Software.  A previous <i>Linux Journal</i> <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/content/european-it-chief-slams-proprietary-software"">article</a> made mention of her recent<br />
comments on OSS vs. proprietary software:<span class="read-more"><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/content/oss-europe-vs-united-states"> more>></a></span></p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1HNfQBSiZ9T4utUvHXWkXm-Hkeo/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1HNfQBSiZ9T4utUvHXWkXm-Hkeo/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1HNfQBSiZ9T4utUvHXWkXm-Hkeo/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1HNfQBSiZ9T4utUvHXWkXm-Hkeo/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?a=3jRi00qZgDM:mDXB6nN8RsA:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?a=3jRi00qZgDM:mDXB6nN8RsA:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?i=3jRi00qZgDM:mDXB6nN8RsA:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?a=3jRi00qZgDM:mDXB6nN8RsA:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?i=3jRi00qZgDM:mDXB6nN8RsA:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?a=3jRi00qZgDM:mDXB6nN8RsA:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?i=3jRi00qZgDM:mDXB6nN8RsA:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?a=3jRi00qZgDM:mDXB6nN8RsA:dnMXMwOfBR0"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?d=dnMXMwOfBR0" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?a=3jRi00qZgDM:mDXB6nN8RsA:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?a=3jRi00qZgDM:mDXB6nN8RsA:l6gmwiTKsz0"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?a=3jRi00qZgDM:mDXB6nN8RsA:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/linuxjournalcom?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"/></a>
</div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/linuxjournalcom/~4/3jRi00qZgDM" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/126402/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brazil Forbids DRM On the Public Domain</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/126260</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/126260#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 04:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kdawson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Break]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking The Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Implementation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wipo Copyright Treaty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nunojsilva writes "Cory Doctorow reports that the Brazilian equivalent of DMCA explicitly forbids using DRM-like techniques on works in the public domain. 'Brazil has just created the best-ever implementation of WCT [WIPO Copyright Treaty]. In Brazil's...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nunojsilva writes &#8220;Cory Doctorow reports that the Brazilian equivalent of DMCA explicitly forbids using DRM-like techniques on works in the public domain. &#8216;Brazil has just created the best-ever implementation of WCT [WIPO Copyright Treaty]. In Brazil&#8217;s version of the law, you can break DRM without breaking the law, provided you&#8217;re not also committing a copyright violation.&#8217; This means that, unlike the US, where it is illegal to break DRM, in Brazil it is illegal to break the public domain.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/07/11/2127246/Brazil-Forbids-DRM-On-the-Public-Domain"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Brazil+Forbids+DRM+On+the+Public+Domain:+http://bit.ly/aH0ceh"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/07/11/2127246/Brazil-Forbids-DRM-On-the-Public-Domain?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1715622&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/ezNHi28PPrxvWLSAB9nhlqjJ2rM/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/ezNHi28PPrxvWLSAB9nhlqjJ2rM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/ezNHi28PPrxvWLSAB9nhlqjJ2rM/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/ezNHi28PPrxvWLSAB9nhlqjJ2rM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/PEcH3R26LK8" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/126260/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Hobby of Energy Secretary Steven Chu</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/126133</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/126133#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 23:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kdawson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Image Objects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Localization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Measurements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Molecule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Laureate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Previous Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary Of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Chu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[quanminoan writes "Nobel Laureate and US Secretary of Energy Steven Chu has continued to publish even while in federal office. While previous research topics include gravitational redshift, Chu has coauthored a paper entitled 'Subnanometre single-molec...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quanminoan writes &#8220;Nobel Laureate and US Secretary of Energy Steven Chu has continued to publish even while in federal office. While previous research topics include gravitational redshift, Chu has coauthored a paper entitled &#8216;Subnanometre single-molecule localization registration and distance measurements&#8217; which discusses a way to optically image objects as small as 0.5 nm &mdash; a major step down from the previous limit of 10 nm. Chu does this in his free time, claiming &#8216;I just consider it my equivalent of &#8230; vegging out in front of the TV.&#8217;&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/07/10/212253/The-Hobby-of-Energy-Secretary-Steven-Chu"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=The+Hobby+of+Energy+Secretary+Steven+Chu:+http://bit.ly/9ARI1y"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/07/10/212253/The-Hobby-of-Energy-Secretary-Steven-Chu?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1715168&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/QR5coYiNXp1ju3CtmE8CM-KLyQ8/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/QR5coYiNXp1ju3CtmE8CM-KLyQ8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/QR5coYiNXp1ju3CtmE8CM-KLyQ8/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/QR5coYiNXp1ju3CtmE8CM-KLyQ8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/ldDuKHLvH7c" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/126133/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Dodges Pointed Questions On US Broadband Plan</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/126110</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/126110#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kdawson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ars covers a series of questions that US senators put to the FCC chairman following up on his appearance before the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee in April. The headline question was a blunt one asked by octogenarian Senator Daniel Inou...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ars covers a series of questions that US senators put to the FCC chairman following up on his appearance before the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee in April. The headline question was a blunt one asked by octogenarian Senator Daniel Inouye (D-HI): &#8220;The National Broadband Plan (NBP) proposes a goal of having 100 million homes subscribed at 100Mbps by 2020,&#8221; he wrote, &#8220;while the leading nations already have 100Mbps fiber-based services at costs of $30 to $40 per month and beginning rollout of 1Gbps residential services, which the FCC suggests is required only for a single anchor institution in each community by 2020. This appears to suggest that the US should accept a 10- to 12-year lag behind the leading nations. What is the FCC&#8217;s rationale for a vision that appears to be firmly rooted in the second tier of countries?&#8221; In the FCC&#8217;s formal response (PDF), Chairman Genachowski doesn&#8217;t rise to the &#8220;second tier&#8221; bait, and in fact talks about &#8220;ensuring that America remains a broadband world leader,&#8221; as if he believes we currently are. A blogger over at Balloon Juice is a little more forthright on the &#8220;What is the FCC&#8217;s rationale&#8221; question: &#8220;The rationale is that this is the best they can do with a legislative branch in the pocket of telecom providers.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/07/10/1921214/FCC-Dodges-Pointed-Questions-On-US-Broadband-Plan"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=FCC+Dodges+Pointed+Questions+On+US+Broadband+Plan:+http://bit.ly/bcDfZl"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/07/10/1921214/FCC-Dodges-Pointed-Questions-On-US-Broadband-Plan?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1715118&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/8p3nTAKnCB0gRnyC2IDsA0nPMxs/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/8p3nTAKnCB0gRnyC2IDsA0nPMxs/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/8p3nTAKnCB0gRnyC2IDsA0nPMxs/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/8p3nTAKnCB0gRnyC2IDsA0nPMxs/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/V9NEDltf-Lw" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/126110/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After a Decade, Digital Radio Still an Also-Ran In UK</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/126066</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/126066#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 09:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>timothy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[beschra writes "Digital Audio Broadcast (DAB) was developed as early as 1981. After launching in the UK 10 years ago, only 24% of listeners listen on DAB. The article credits a good part of the delay to the fact that the technology was largely develope...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>beschra writes &#8220;Digital Audio Broadcast (DAB) was developed as early as 1981. After launching in the UK 10 years ago, only 24% of listeners listen on DAB. The article credits a good part of the delay to the fact that the technology was largely developed under the Europe-wide Eureka 147 research project. How does government vs. commercial development help or hinder acceptance of new technology? From the article: &#8216;&#8221;If Nokia develops something, they&#8217;ll be bringing out the handsets before you know it,&#8221; [analyst Grant Goddard says]. &#8220;Because DAB was a pan-European development, you had to have agreement from all sides before you could do anything. That meant progress was extremely slow.&#8221; But this alone did not account for the hold-up. The sheer complexity of introducing and regulating the system was also a major factor, Mr. Goddard adds.&#8221;&#8216;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/07/09/2353241/After-a-Decade-Digital-Radio-Still-an-Also-Ran-In-UK"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=After+a+Decade,+Digital+Radio+Still+an+Also-Ran+In+UK:+http://bit.ly/awRPk5"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/07/09/2353241/After-a-Decade-Digital-Radio-Still-an-Also-Ran-In-UK?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1714572&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/MbdzBpNKjqVMyJpu5Balv7IRJz8/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/MbdzBpNKjqVMyJpu5Balv7IRJz8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/MbdzBpNKjqVMyJpu5Balv7IRJz8/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/MbdzBpNKjqVMyJpu5Balv7IRJz8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/ePRv3zRcZaE" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/126066/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No iPhone Apps, Please &#8212; We&#8217;re British</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/125859</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/125859#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 06:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samzenpus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cool Britannia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galen Gruman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mentality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modern Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxpayer Funds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GMGruman writes "The BBC has stirred up quite a row in Britain about a shocking use of taxpayer funds: creating iPhone apps to provide citizens services. As InfoWorld blogger Galen Gruman notes, it's apparently bad in Britain for the government to use ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GMGruman writes &#8220;The BBC has stirred up quite a row in Britain about a shocking use of taxpayer funds: creating iPhone apps to provide citizens services. As InfoWorld blogger Galen Gruman notes, it&#8217;s apparently bad in Britain for the government to use modern technology during a recession, a mentality he likens as a shift from &#8216;cool Britannia&#8217; to &#8216;fool Britannia.&#8217;&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://politics.slashdot.org/story/10/07/08/0246257/No-iPhone-Apps-Please-mdash-Were-British"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=No+iPhone+Apps,+Please+&mdash;+We're+British:+http://bit.ly/aYooaY"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://politics.slashdot.org/story/10/07/08/0246257/No-iPhone-Apps-Please-mdash-Were-British?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1711892&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/jkFrqzysOJcsqNKQvwCc3HtUqfA/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/jkFrqzysOJcsqNKQvwCc3HtUqfA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/jkFrqzysOJcsqNKQvwCc3HtUqfA/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/jkFrqzysOJcsqNKQvwCc3HtUqfA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/GJVp7_qizRk" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/125859/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Survey Says To UK &#8212; Repeal Laws of Thermodynamics</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/125636</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/125636#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 05:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kdawson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[mostxlnt writes "As we noted, the new Tory UK government has launched a website asking its subjects which laws they'd most like repealed. There are proposals up for repeal of the Laws of Thermodynamics: Second, Third, and all (discussion thread on this...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mostxlnt writes &#8220;As we noted, the new Tory UK government has launched a website asking its subjects which laws they&#8217;d most like repealed. There are proposals up for repeal of the Laws of Thermodynamics: Second, Third, and all (discussion thread on this one closed by a moderator). One comment on the Third [now apparently deleted] elucidated: &#8216;Without the Third Law of Thermodynamics, it would be possible to build machines that would last forever and provide an endless source of cheap energy. thus solving both potential crises in energy supply as well as solving the greenhouse gas problem in one step&#8230; simples&#8230; eh?&#8217;&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/07/06/0113210/Survey-Says-To-UK-mdash-Repeal-Laws-of-Thermodynamics"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Survey+Says+To+UK+&mdash;+Repeal+Laws+of+Thermodynamics:+http://bit.ly/bIBbJW"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/07/06/0113210/Survey-Says-To-UK-mdash-Repeal-Laws-of-Thermodynamics?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1709010&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/_ibfCYqR-oew04cpoqz4s0zzE0M/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/_ibfCYqR-oew04cpoqz4s0zzE0M/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/_ibfCYqR-oew04cpoqz4s0zzE0M/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/_ibfCYqR-oew04cpoqz4s0zzE0M/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/gif1vgKRsFs" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/125636/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California To Drop State Rock Over Asbestos Concerns</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/125558</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/125558#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Soulskill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asbestos Claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asbestos Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assembly Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bedrock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Sb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Californian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer Mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carcinogen Exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysotile Asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compensation Claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gloria Romero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minerals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partisan Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Support Groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tracts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Diamonddavej writes "The LA Times reports that Californian legislators are close to dropping the translucent green rock Serpentine as the state rock of California because of its tenuous association with chrysotile asbestos. Sen. Gloria Romero declares ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diamonddavej writes &#8220;The LA Times reports that Californian legislators are close to dropping the translucent green rock Serpentine as the state rock of California because of its tenuous association with chrysotile asbestos. Sen. Gloria Romero declares in her bill (SB 624) that Serpentine should be dropped as California&#8217;s state rock because it &#8216;contains the deadly mineral chrysotile asbestos, a known carcinogen, exposure to which increases the risk of the cancer mesothelioma.&#8217; The bill has backing from mesothelioma support groups. Critics point out that Serpentine is a group of 20 different minerals, and Californian Serpentine rarely contains much chrysotile, never mind its dangerous fibrous asbestos form. Its is suspected that lawyers involved in asbestos compensation claims and clean up companies will profit from the bill. Vast tracts for California where bedrock is made of Serpentine could be declared hazardous to health&#8230; even if it contains no crysotile at all! It looks like SB 624 will be passed; it won unanimous bi-partisan support from an Assembly committee last week.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://politics.slashdot.org/story/10/07/05/1646200/California-To-Drop-State-Rock-Over-Asbestos-Concerns"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=California+To+Drop+State+Rock+Over+Asbestos+Concerns:+http://bit.ly/dtpvqK"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://politics.slashdot.org/story/10/07/05/1646200/California-To-Drop-State-Rock-Over-Asbestos-Concerns?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1708674&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/uQj2Eokp4X5mLU95diMyEuaK4y4/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/uQj2Eokp4X5mLU95diMyEuaK4y4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/uQj2Eokp4X5mLU95diMyEuaK4y4/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/uQj2Eokp4X5mLU95diMyEuaK4y4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/UgiBQVzURnI" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/125558/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spectral Imaging Reveals Jefferson Nixed &#8216;Subjects&#8217; for &#8216;Citizens&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/125387</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/125387#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>timothy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Declaration Of Independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independence Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spectral Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Jefferson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jamie points out this excellent piece, well timed for America's Independence Day, that says spectrographic evidence has established that the one word Thomas Jefferson fully blotted out from an early draft of the Declaration of Independence was not "res...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamie points out this excellent piece, well timed for America&#8217;s Independence Day, that says spectrographic evidence has established that the one word Thomas Jefferson fully blotted out from an early draft of the Declaration of Independence was not &#8220;resident,&#8221; or &#8220;patriot,&#8221; but rather &#8220;subject.&#8221; This, he replaced with &#8220;citizen.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/07/03/1935215/Spectral-Imaging-Reveals-Jefferson-Nixed-Subjects-for-Citizens"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Spectral+Imaging+Reveals+Jefferson+Nixed+'Subjects'+for+'Citizens':+http://bit.ly/9l2oqB"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/07/03/1935215/Spectral-Imaging-Reveals-Jefferson-Nixed-Subjects-for-Citizens?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1707500&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/nJ-uaMIAXeHREg3tJfjjWa8VjWw/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/nJ-uaMIAXeHREg3tJfjjWa8VjWw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/nJ-uaMIAXeHREg3tJfjjWa8VjWw/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/nJ-uaMIAXeHREg3tJfjjWa8VjWw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/QS6ZCLkME9k" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/125387/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Sales Tax Gets a New Champion</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/125338</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/125338#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 12:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>timothy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Archness1 writes with an excerpt from Declan McCullagh's piece at CNET about the recently renewed push for a sales tax on Internet purchases, led by Massachusetts Representative Bill Delahunt. "At the moment, Americans who shop over the Internet from o...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Archness1 writes with an excerpt from Declan McCullagh&#8217;s piece at CNET about the recently renewed push for a sales tax on Internet purchases, led by Massachusetts Representative Bill Delahunt. &#8220;At the moment, Americans who shop over the Internet from out-of-state vendors usually aren&#8217;t required to pay sales taxes. Californians buying books from Amazon.com or cameras from Manhattan&#8217;s B&amp;H Photo, for example, won&#8217;t be required to cough up the sales taxes that they would if shopping at a local mall.&#8221; That could all change, though.
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://politics.slashdot.org/story/10/07/03/0254253/Internet-Sales-Tax-Gets-a-New-Champion"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Internet+Sales+Tax+Gets+a+New+Champion:+http://bit.ly/aGFezk"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://politics.slashdot.org/story/10/07/03/0254253/Internet-Sales-Tax-Gets-a-New-Champion?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1707030&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/lgN3PAFHVMOsDpVtgwVAN1vyCy4/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/lgN3PAFHVMOsDpVtgwVAN1vyCy4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/lgN3PAFHVMOsDpVtgwVAN1vyCy4/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/lgN3PAFHVMOsDpVtgwVAN1vyCy4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/VkY8G6NHk1o" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/125338/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK Gov&#8217;t Launches &#8216;Your Freedom&#8217; Website To Seek Laws Worth Repealing</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/125315</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/125315#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 09:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>timothy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Behest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deputy Prime Minister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Statesman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police Uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Principle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scrutiny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.K. government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uk Gov]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Firefalcon writes "The UK Government launched Thursday the 'Your Freedom' website, headed by the Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, to 'identify laws that should be repealed.' In a recent tweet, Police State UK pointed out an article in the New Statesma...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefalcon writes &#8220;The UK Government launched Thursday the &#8216;Your Freedom&#8217; website, headed by the Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, to &#8216;identify laws that should be repealed.&#8217; In a recent tweet, Police State UK pointed out an article in the New Statesman which appeals for people to call on the Government to repeal the ill thought-out Digital Economy Act that was rushed through Parliament without sufficient scrutiny. While part of the Act is regarding the digital TV switchover, other sections allow for users to be restricted or disconnected from the Internet at the behest of copyright owners, which goes against the principle of &#8216;innocent until proven guilty&#8217; that has been in place since the Magna Carta.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/07/03/0123250/UK-Govt-Launches-Your-Freedom-Website-To-Seek-Laws-Worth-Repealing"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=UK+Gov't+Launches+'Your+Freedom'+Website+To+Seek+Laws+Worth+Repealing:+http://bit.ly/9XY0EK"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/07/03/0123250/UK-Govt-Launches-Your-Freedom-Website-To-Seek-Laws-Worth-Repealing?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1706976&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/mst2r9CeFj9coM1W0kOXxiXubnc/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/mst2r9CeFj9coM1W0kOXxiXubnc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/mst2r9CeFj9coM1W0kOXxiXubnc/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/mst2r9CeFj9coM1W0kOXxiXubnc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/cun1x3Cj3Yk" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/125315/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alleged Russian Spy Ring Exposed In US</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/124804</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/124804#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kdawson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Circles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyprus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fbi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Femme Fatale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydrangeas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOSCOW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prosecutors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russian Foreign Ministry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russian Spy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spy Ring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tradecraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upper Echelons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wsj]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several readers sent in the story of an alleged Russian spy ring busted yesterday by the FBI after a decade-long investigation. The FBI says that Moscow trained and planted long-term "moles" in the US in order to infiltrate the upper echelons of US gov...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several readers sent in the story of an alleged Russian spy ring busted yesterday by the FBI after a decade-long investigation. The FBI says that Moscow trained and planted long-term &#8220;moles&#8221; in the US in order to infiltrate the upper echelons of US government and business circles and pass back intelligence to the Russians. Twelve people have been charged; ten were arrested in the US (one is at large) and one in Cyprus. Wired and the New York Post have colorful coverage. Wired&#8217;s leans on the tradecraft and discusses steganography, while the Post favors the femme fatale angle (alleged spy Anna Chapman). The Russian Foreign Ministry said that the US actions were unfounded and pursued &#8220;unseemly&#8221; goals. One of many choice quotes from copious coverage: &#8220;They couldn&#8217;t have been spies. Look what she did with the hydrangeas.&#8221; From the WSJ report: &#8220;Officials said no secrets were compromised or revealed in the alleged plot, and the spy operation seems to have yielded little of value given some of the elaborate methods deployed. None of the 11 charged by US prosecutors was accused of accessing any classified or sensitive US government information.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fyro.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F10%2F06%2F29%2F2013225%2FAlleged-Russian-Spy-Ring-Exposed-In-US"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Alleged+Russian+Spy+Ring+Exposed+In+US%3A+http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2Fa68JvV"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/06/29/2013225/Alleged-Russian-Spy-Ring-Exposed-In-US?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1702702&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/4Rm81Jq1CM0OF_Q56fCFPq93QSc/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/4Rm81Jq1CM0OF_Q56fCFPq93QSc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/4Rm81Jq1CM0OF_Q56fCFPq93QSc/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/4Rm81Jq1CM0OF_Q56fCFPq93QSc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/aB-zzdzweBI" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/124804/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama To Nearly Double the Available Broadband Wireless Spectrum</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/124700</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/124700#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Soulskill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automobile Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadband Wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Adviser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Appliances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawrence Summers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megahertz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Telecommunications And Information Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Running Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suraj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablet Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Spectrum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[suraj.sun tips news that the Obama administration announced today plans to free up roughly 500Mhz of the wireless spectrum for commercial broadband. From the Washington Post:
"The commitment backs a proposal by the Federal Communications Commission to ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>suraj.sun tips news that the Obama administration announced today plans to free up roughly 500Mhz of the wireless spectrum for commercial broadband. From the Washington Post:<br />
&#8220;The commitment backs a proposal by the Federal Communications Commission to auction off broadcasters&#8217; and government spectrum to commercial carriers that envision their networks running home appliances, automobile applications, tablet computers and other wireless devices. White House economic adviser Lawrence Summers said in a speech outlining the president&#8217;s plan that freeing up more spectrum will spur economic growth through auctions of the airwaves and investment in wireless networks and technology. &#8230; The FCC has proposed that 280 megahertz of spectrum come from broadcasters and other sources, 120 of which would come from broadcasters. The other 220 megahertz would come from the federal government&rsquo;s holdings managed by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmobile.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F10%2F06%2F28%2F187255%2FObama-To-Nearly-Double-the-Available-Broadband-Wireless-Spectrum"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Obama+To+Nearly+Double+the+Available+Broadband+Wireless+Spectrum%3A+http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2Fa30D9Y"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/10/06/28/187255/Obama-To-Nearly-Double-the-Available-Broadband-Wireless-Spectrum?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1701140&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/bcUc3Hm_JjUpyFrSCdPRKqByckc/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/bcUc3Hm_JjUpyFrSCdPRKqByckc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/bcUc3Hm_JjUpyFrSCdPRKqByckc/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/bcUc3Hm_JjUpyFrSCdPRKqByckc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/fZgaV9K-9fE" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/124700/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sen. Bond Disses Internet &#8216;Kill Switch&#8217; Bill</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/124599</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/124599#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 22:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kdawson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GovTechGuy writes "Sen. Kit Bond (R-Mo.) has introduced his own cybersecurity legislation with Sen. Orrin Hatch, and he had some harsh words for a competing bill sponsored by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security. Bond said that bill, which has bee...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GovTechGuy writes &#8220;Sen. Kit Bond (R-Mo.) has introduced his own cybersecurity legislation with Sen. Orrin Hatch, and he had some harsh words for a competing bill sponsored by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security. Bond said that bill, which has been criticized for allegedly giving the president a &#8216;kill switch&#8217; over the Internet, weighs down the private sector with mandates and puts too much on the plate of the already overburdened Department of Homeland Security. Sen. Bond&#8217;s bill would create a new position in the Pentagon, reporting directly to the President, in charge of coordinating all civilian cybersecurity. Any private-sector involvement would be voluntary and free from legal challenge, rather than mandated.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fpolitics.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F10%2F06%2F27%2F1845255%2FSen-Bond-Disses-Internet-Kill-Switch-Bill"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Sen.+Bond+Disses+Internet+'Kill+Switch'+Bill%3A+http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2FbwT4Uu"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://politics.slashdot.org/story/10/06/27/1845255/Sen-Bond-Disses-Internet-Kill-Switch-Bill?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1700056&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/9V6JWH2Tw7y5pqV742X7g7QMesY/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/9V6JWH2Tw7y5pqV742X7g7QMesY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/9V6JWH2Tw7y5pqV742X7g7QMesY/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/9V6JWH2Tw7y5pqV742X7g7QMesY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/quaSA6IgDtA" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/124599/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House Unveils Plans For &quot;Trusted Identities In Cyberspace&quot;</title>
		<link>http://inter5.org/archives/124464</link>
		<comments>http://inter5.org/archives/124464#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 13:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Soulskill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coordinater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyberspace Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Certificate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecosystem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Health Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Schmidt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interoperable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[List Of Usernames]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mdash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nstic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plan Pdf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usernames And Passwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Presto Vivace writes with news that the Obama administration's cyber-security coordinater, Howard Schmidt, yesterday unveiled a national plan for "trusted" online identities. Schmidt wrote,
"The NSTIC, which is in response to one of the near term actio...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Presto Vivace writes with news that the Obama administration&#8217;s cyber-security coordinater, Howard Schmidt, yesterday unveiled a national plan for &#8220;trusted&#8221; online identities. Schmidt wrote,<br />
&#8220;The NSTIC, which is in response to one of the near term action items in the President&rsquo;s Cyberspace Policy Review, calls for the creation of an online environment, or an Identity Ecosystem as we refer to it in the strategy, where individuals and organizations can complete online transactions with confidence, trusting the identities of each other and the identities of the infrastructure that the transaction runs on. For example, no longer should individuals have to remember an ever-expanding and potentially insecure list of usernames and passwords to login into various online services. Through the strategy we seek to enable a future where individuals can voluntarily choose to obtain a secure, interoperable, and privacy-enhancing credential (e.g., a smart identity card, a digital certificate on their cell phone, etc.) from a variety of service providers &mdash; both public and private &mdash; to authenticate themselves online for different types of transactions (e.g., online banking, accessing electronic health records, sending email, etc.).&#8221;<br />
You can read the full draft of the plan (PDF), and the White House is seeking public comments on it as well.
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fyro.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F10%2F06%2F26%2F1247201%2FWhite-House-Unveils-Plans-For-Trusted-Identities-In-Cyberspace"  title="Share on Facebook"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p>      <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=White+House+Unveils+Plans+For+%22Trusted+Identities+In+Cyberspace%22%3A+http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2FcmeFNu"  title="Share on Twitter"><img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/06/26/1247201/White-House-Unveils-Plans-For-Trusted-Identities-In-Cyberspace?from=rss">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?op=discuss&amp;id=1699416&amp;smallembed=1" style="height: 300px; width: 100%; border: none;"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/qI5fVjMSTXpvW6b4NE0Y9q_or0U/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/qI5fVjMSTXpvW6b4NE0Y9q_or0U/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/qI5fVjMSTXpvW6b4NE0Y9q_or0U/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/qI5fVjMSTXpvW6b4NE0Y9q_or0U/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/tB1257yx26M" height="1" width="1"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inter5.org/archives/124464/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
